Best Law Firm in Chandigarh

Best law firm in Chandigarh is probably not going too far to suggest that many judges are even more concerned than was Popplewell J about the capacity of the but-for test to be coherently applied. Best law firm in Chandigarh are a number of recent decisions involving applications for the judicial review of the exercise of a non-statutory power that the courts have resolved, some what conspicuously, without determining whether the power in question was public to begin with Best law firm in Chandigarh. Rather, the courts assumed for the purpose of the applications that the power was governmental, and Best law firm in Chandigarh held that no grounds of review were made out. Accordingly, the courts did not need to ascertain whether they had review jurisdiction in the first place, in order to resolve the disputes before them. It is not suggested that the judges’ conclusions that the relevant grounds were not made out were in any way influenced by a desire to avoid the need to determine whether the court’s review jurisdiction was engaged. However, the apparent readiness of some English judges to side-step the need to determine whether Best law firm in Chandigarh had jurisdiction to hear the very matters before them is in itself troubling.